Skip to main content

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR CONTROL OF STORM WATER RUNOFF AT A LARGE DAIRY

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

An over 1000-head dairy farm in the largest watershed in the State of Michigan was designed to drain excess water to an agricultural ditch that flowed into a bayou and then to the primary river of the watershed, the Grand River. This farm was also of particular concern since a portion is located in the 100-year floodplain and approximately 30 miles upstream of one of the State's primary beach resorts.

The original farm was built prior to 1980 and has since undergone a number of changes. Similar to many farms constructed in the past, excess water generated at the facility was looked at from a transport and disposal perspective and not from an environmental perspective. The farm is situated at the edge of a steep incline and was designed to channel water down the incline to an agricultural drain located at the bottom of the slope. A washroom utilized by farm employees and a drain associated with cleaning nursery equipment discharged directly onto site soils at separate locations near the top of the slope. The farm also contained numerous areas where rainwater that ran toward the agricultural drain came into contact with nutrient rich material including: silage storage areas, partially covered feed alleys, exercise lots, calf hutch areas, and livestock alleys. Finally, natural springs located along the slope added to the volume of water that needed to be transported offsite.

Surface drains located throughout the facility collected the majority of the runoff. Some of the flow was directed to a sedimentation/infiltration area prior to flowing down the slope and into the agricultural ditch. The remainder of the runoff captured by the surface drains flowed to a conduit located at the top of the incline and was severely eroding the soils at the outlet. Due to sediment accumulation and the addition of impervious surfaces associated with facility expansion, the sedimentation/infiltration area was being short-circuited and runoff entering the agricultural ditch allegedly contained pollutants in excess of State standards.

As a result of the alleged “release” and in the anticipation of new State discharge requirements, the farm was retrofitted so that any form of “dirty” surface water discharge could be eliminated: the washroom and nursery sinks were connected to a new septic system, the storm water runoff pathways were mapped, separated, and designated as “dirty” storm water and “clean” storm water, and a clay lined “dirty” storm water retention pond was constructed in conformance with NRCS standards and replaced the separation/filtration area. The pond was designed to store rainfall runoff resulting from precipitation generated during the winter months, plus the runoff generated from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event. The “dirty” storm water is now used to hydrate manure in the pits under the freestalls and the excess is applied onto nearby fields via two center pivot systems. Also, an unlined “clean” storm water detention pond was constructed to store runoff from a 5-year, 24-hour storm event and a riprapped spillway for the “clean” storm water detention pond was designed for circumstances when the design storm event was exceeded. The area around a natural spring that was located in an exercise lot was tiled and the flow was channeled, via a solid tile, north towards the agricultural ditch. The agricultural ditch was filled and a drain tile was installed to facilitate infiltration so overland/channelized flow could be avoided. In addition to the above mentioned tasks and since the majority of the earthwork took place in the 100-year floodplain of the Grand River, permits had to be obtained from the State and local authorities.

These changes were completed by the end of November 2001. However, keeping the “clean” storm water runoff from contacting/transporting nutrient rich material has proved operational problematic. In 2003 the operator directed us to prepare a plan to combine the ponds into one so that all storm water runoff will be managed through irrigation. The new pond was completed in 2003.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2004-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more