Skip to main content

Evaluating the Chesapeake Bay Program's Use Attainability Analysis for Nutrient Reduction Strategy

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's current effort to establish water quality criteria for the Chesapeake Bay has the potential to move the Bay toward a new level of use and enjoyment. It also has significant implications for the citizens of the watershed and their governments beyond guiding the enhancement of water resources. The criteria have the potential to dictate the need for, and the timing of billions of dollars in capital upgrades at municipal wastewater treatment plants and comparable investments by other sources of nutrients. This level of investment will affect the allocation of limited taxpayer resources and economic growth and development throughout the region.

The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office's (CBPO) UAA approach is documented in the Technical Support Document for the Identification of Chesapeake Bay Designated Uses and Attainability (TSD-UAA).

Because of the potentially large impact to its constituents, the Virginia Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (VAMWA) and the Maryland Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (MAMWA) evaluated the TSD-UAA with respect to use assessment, the cost of nutrient controls and the costs to control CSO and SSO. In addition, consideration was given to the potential of social impacts on growth and the displacement of growth to non-sewered areas. The evaluation included the potential of negative environmental impacts exceeding the benefits of the proposed EPA water quality criteria. The University of Cincinnati Economics Center for Education and Research was engaged to develop the means of evaluating these social impacts.

The evaluation proposed the following:



Support Water Quality Goals that can be met by 2010. Set these as targets under the Bay program for all to achieve. Do not set standards that are known to be unattainable.


Develop an approach that encourages POTWs to install the most cost-effective controls, but does not impose caps that will lead to more environmental damage than the benefit provided.


Consider the control of SSOs, storm water, and CSOs as a part of setting additional requirements on POTWs so these programs can proceed in priority of need

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864703784828228

Publication date: 2003-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more