Skip to main content

THE COMPLICATIONS OF MONITORING TREATMENT BMPs

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

The use of best management practices (BMPs) in an urban watershed can provide pollutant load reductions at a relatively low cost. BMPs can range from being management operations (such as street sweeping or reducing the amount of pesticides used on urban lawns) to structural treatment options (the four most common alternatives being detention/retention ponds, swales, filter/buffer strips and constructed wetlands). Evaluation of BMP performance requires adequate monitoring to report “true” values of their treatment capabilities. This paper focuses on the complications associated with monitoring structural BMPs and provides an overview of the drawbacks of existing monitoring systems, limitations of monitoring devices and methodologies, inadequacies of commonly used monitoring parameters and their impacts on the performance and design of treatment BMPs.

One of the complications of existing monitoring systems is that we measure standard parameters instead of those pertinent to pollutant removals. For example, total suspended solids is frequently measured to indicated the solids loading and removal in a retention pond. But a more important measurement could be total settleable solids, since only those particles that will settle out in the retention pond are pertinent to its effectiveness. Further, determination of particle size and settling velocity distribution of the solids is important because a significant portion of pollutants present in stormwater are adsorbed on the finer fraction of the suspended solids. A significant portion will not settle out in a retention pond, so no matter how large the pond is designed, reasonable pollutant removals cannot be expected. However, particle size distribution estimates are not only time consuming but also expensive, so they are rarely done in routine monitoring of BMPs.

Proper monitoring is absolutely necessary if we are to best evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs and their impact in improving water quality in urban watersheds.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864703784829038

Publication date: January 1, 2003

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2003/00002003/00000004/art00072
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more