The impact of model input and calibration data errors on predictive uncertainty is examined. First, the ability of PEST to identify correct input parameter sets under ideal conditions is tested. PEST is used to calibrate HSPF against a pseudo “observed” time series, i.e. output from a pre-calibrated HSPF model. PEST is then run in predictive mode to identify minimum and maximum predictions of surface runoff rate. Artificial measurement errors are then imposed on the flow gage and precipitation time series, and other key model inputs. For each alteration of the model input or calibration time series, PEST is run in predictive mode to identify the effect on predictive uncertainty. The effects from the following error types are examined: precipitation time series errors including altered storm volumes, overall percent change in precipitation, and a random error function; streamflow gage errors including systematic bias and a random error function; non-representative precipitation and other meteorological gage data (switched with another nearby gage); incorrect fixed input parameters such as stage/discharge relationship and overland flow plane variables; and incorrect parameter range limits.

Methods of insulating model applications from these potential errors are examined. Specifically, the protective effect of different objective function component types against certain error types is demonstrated. Objective function components included in the study are simulated versus measured daily streamflow, cumulative seasonal flow volumes, flow exceedence curves, and other corrective measures. Specific objective function components, found effective in protecting against common errors in model input and/or calibration time series, are identified.", pages = "762-780", url = "http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/wef/wefproc/2003/00002003/00000004/art00043", doi = "doi:10.2175/193864703784828903" }