Reducing Predictive Uncertainty in HSPF Watershed Model Applications: Impact of Calibration Data and Model Input Errors
Abstract:WinHSPF is the interface to the HSPF lumped parameter watershed model in the EPA BASINS modeling system. WinHSPF includes a driver for the Parameter Estimation (PEST) program. PEST calibrates models by minimizing an “objective function” quantifying the misfit between model outputs and corresponding field measurements. Where flow gage, precipitation, and other model data are error free, the model structure perfectly represents actual watersheds, and model parameters are not redundant, minimizing an objective function should result in a single unique input parameter set and highly certain model predictions. In the real world, errors in model input, calibration data, and model structure result in equivalent measures of goodness of fit for wholly distinct input parameter sets. PEST, run in predictive mode, identifies those input parameter sets that maximize and minimize a given prediction while satisfying the condition that the model satisfactorily fits historical data. This range of uncertainty in model prediction results from parameter non-uniqueness, and from data and model errors.
The impact of model input and calibration data errors on predictive uncertainty is examined. First, the ability of PEST to identify correct input parameter sets under ideal conditions is tested. PEST is used to calibrate HSPF against a pseudo “observed” time series, i.e. output from a pre-calibrated HSPF model. PEST is then run in predictive mode to identify minimum and maximum predictions of surface runoff rate. Artificial measurement errors are then imposed on the flow gage and precipitation time series, and other key model inputs. For each alteration of the model input or calibration time series, PEST is run in predictive mode to identify the effect on predictive uncertainty. The effects from the following error types are examined: precipitation time series errors including altered storm volumes, overall percent change in precipitation, and a random error function; streamflow gage errors including systematic bias and a random error function; non-representative precipitation and other meteorological gage data (switched with another nearby gage); incorrect fixed input parameters such as stage/discharge relationship and overland flow plane variables; and incorrect parameter range limits.
Methods of insulating model applications from these potential errors are examined. Specifically, the protective effect of different objective function component types against certain error types is demonstrated. Objective function components included in the study are simulated versus measured daily streamflow, cumulative seasonal flow volumes, flow exceedence curves, and other corrective measures. Specific objective function components, found effective in protecting against common errors in model input and/or calibration time series, are identified.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2003
More about this publication?
- Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- About WEF Proceedings
- WEFTEC Conference Information
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites