Skip to main content

RECENT COMPARISON STUDIES TO ASSIST IN SELECTION OF ADVANCED MODELING TOOLS FOR TMDL DEVELOPMENT

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

The degree of analysis, and complexity of tools, required to develop TMDL components ranges from simple, screening level approaches based on limited data to detailed investigations driven by extensive data. A variety of interrelated factors determine the analysis approach and tools that are appropriate for developing each TMDL. The factors include the type of impairment, the physical, biological and chemical processes occurring in the waterbody and its watershed; the size of the watershed; the number and type of sources; the amount of time, data and resources available for TMDL development; and the types and costs of actions needed to implement the TMDL. Generally speaking, more detailed and effort-intensive TMDL development techniques are warranted where there is significant uncertainty concerning whether pollutant sources are attributable to human or natural sources and the anticipated cost of controls is especially high. In such situations professionals responsible for TMDL development are likely to be faced with the need to select and use one or more complex, or advanced, environmental simulation models to support their efforts.

This paper focuses on four recent studies performed to compare the capabilities of advanced simulation models. All studies were performed in a research and development context, but all have yielded results that are useful in guiding model selection for TMDL development efforts. Within the TMDL context, models are commonly used to establish the linkage of a variety of water quality targets and sources, and to provide a means for comparing various allocation strategies. The models that were compared in the studies include hydrodynamic, sediment, toxic chemical, eutrophication, bioaccumulation and groundwater models. This paper deals collectively with the materials, conclusions and recommendations that have resulted from the efforts expended in performing recent model comparison studies for the Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2003-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more