Skip to main content

BUSINESS DECISIONS AND INDUSTRIAL PRETREATMENT OPTIONS

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

An Air Force Base in Texas went through Base Closure and Realignment (BRAC) in 2001. As part of this process, portions of the base were subleased to several new industrial tenants who perform similar aircraft maintenance and repair work.

The Air Force Base operated its own pretreatment facility, which directly discharged to surface waters under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. With BRAC, operations which formerly directly discharged to the pretreatment facility were now conducted by industrial tenants who neither owned or operated the facility. An economic evaluation was conducted to determine pretreatment alternatives under the new scenario. This economic evaluation looked at modifying the existing facility to allow continued use as is, modifying the existing facility to pretreat and directly discharge to the publicly owned treatment works (POTW), building a new pretreatment facility for use by all tenants, building individual pretreatment systems, and the cost for no pretreatment (hauling wastewater offsite for pretreatment/disposal).

During the partitioning of the AFB into several sections operated by private tenants, several technical, liability, and regulatory issues developed which caused individual maintenance of pretreatment systems to be more viable than continued use of the existing AFB WWPF. Technical and regulatory issues continue with respect to responsibility for the actual stormwater collection system.

Prior to shutting down and dismantling the pretreatment system, the industrial tenants individually determined the best business option for their operations. For one tenant, CH2M HILL collected analytical data on three industrial wastewater sources for approximately 6 months, and then conducted a pretreatment alternatives evaluation. As a result, some of the water was directly discharged to the local POTW and a treatability study was performed for removal of cyanide and heavy metals. This evaluation led to predesign of a pretreatment system, which was used to solicit bids from pretreatment system vendors.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864703784343929

Publication date: 2003-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more