Skip to main content

Residuals – Reality and Models Compared

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Solids handling and disposal in the water treatment industry is a major concern to most utilities. Considerable time, effort, and expense are spent collecting, processing, and disposing solids. Therefore, it is important to be able to accurately predict solids production when designing a new water treatment plant or when considering changes to an existing one. Inaccurate predictions can cost a plant millions of dollars in retrofits to solids handling facilities and/or increased disposal costs.

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the accuracy of two well-known mathematical models for predicting water treatment plant solids production – the American Water Works Association (AWWA) and the Water Research Center (WRc- commonly used in Great Britain) methods. Model results were compared with documentation of residuals handling obtained from the 50-mgd William S. Warner WTP located in Fairfield, CT. The Warner facility treats water from the Hemlocks Reservoir using a dissolved air flotation (DAF) process and filtration. Residuals produced by the DAF process are removed as floated solids by skimmers and collected in a solids collection tank. The collected solids are dewatered using centrifuges. Cake produced by the centrifuges is conveyed to trucks and hauled off-site for disposal. Centrate is discharged to the sewer. Data indicating the quantity of solids produced were collected (1997–2001) and analyzed and a mass-balance was performed to verify the total solids produced. Raw water quality and chemical use data were also obtained from the plant. These data were input into the models and the model output was compared to actual plant data.

Different aspects of these methods were analyzed and adjusted accordingly for the Hemlocks Reservoir water quality parameters. The WRc method accounts for the precipitation of organic matter in quantifying the residuals while the AWWA method neglects this contribution.

The results show that both theoretical models overestimated solids production for the Warner WTP. Of the two models, the AWWA method produced more accurate results. This could be a function of this water supply and treatment scheme. The applicability of the theoretical models to waters of other types and qualities should be studied further. Examples of different outcomes and guidance regarding when to use which model are presented.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864703784292133

Publication date: January 1, 2003

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2003/00002003/00000001/art00100
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more