COMPARISON OF BELT PRESS VS. CENTRIFUGE DEWATERING CHARACTERISTICS FOR ANAEROBIC THERMOPHILIC DIGESTION

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

A full-scale, side-by-side comparison study of filter belt press and centrifuge dewatering was started in January 2002 at Inland Empire Utilities Agency's Regional Water Recycling Plant No. 2. The duration of the testing in this study is four months. The full-scale, side-by-side comparison study was conducted at sludge feed rates of 80 – 100 gpm (1,000 – 1,200 lb/hr). The study did an evaluation of the two dewatering processes based on the quality of the dewatered biosolids, the filtrate/centrate quality, polymer dosage, energy consumption, odors, and ease of operation. With the use of centrifuge, the dewatered biosolids improved in cake and centrate quality by 33% and 58%, respectively, compared to the dewatered biosolids from the filter belt presses. Polymer dosage had to be increased by approximately 50% to achieve optimum operation with the centrifuge. Electrical cost of operation also increased by 120% with the centrifuge compared to the filter belt press. In addition, the centrifuge also appeared to be much more flexible in handling the various staged thermophilic sludge feeds. In all the different scenarios, the centrifuge cake yielded higher cake solids at a higher energy cost. Significant timesavings were also realized due to the 24 hr/day operation and the reduced shutdown and cleanup time of the centrifuge. The total annual cost of operation of the centrifuge, at 473,000 was considerably lower than that of the filter belt presses at 509,000.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864703784292520

Publication date: January 1, 2003

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more