If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
The City of Dallas Water Utilities Department (DWU) faced two major challenges at its Central Wastewater Treatment Plant (Central Plant) in 1998. First, an existing sludge storage lagoon at the Central Plant was now inactive and was required to be officially closed. When the existing
lagoon was closed, DWU would require a facility for the emergency storage of approximately ten million gallons of sludge. Second, a Major Interceptor Study indicated that additional peak flow detention was required at the Central Plant. The existing peak flow storage at the Central Plant was
approximately 65 million gallons (MG) and a minimum of 215 MG detention capacity would be required to accommodate the additional flows associated with a five year design storm event. The City's Residuals Wastewater Master Plan had concluded that the only alternative for closing the
Lagoon was to remove the sludge from the lagoon and haul it to a hazardous waste landfill, at an estimated cost of 12 million. This did not include the costs of improvements required to convert the lagoon to a peak flow storage basin. It was clear that the peak flow improvements were required
and due to space limitations at the site, peak flow improvements needed to be constructed on the sludge lagoon site. Detailed investigations were implemented to identify the cost effective alternatives available for managing the sludge in the lagoon. Approximately 225,000 cubic yards of
sludge varying in consistency from solid to liquid was in the lagoon. Several alternatives for the ultimate disposa of the sludge were evaluated. Alternatives for sludge disposal considered included: co-disposing the sludge off site at City-owned facilities, contract treat and land apply for
beneficial re-use; contract haul for disposal; and haul and land apply with City forces. All alternatives were carefully evaluated and measured against the DWU Residuals Master Plan, current City operations and capabilities, state and federal regulations and economic factors to determine the
best Sludge management solution and also provide the required Peak Flow Detention System to meet the storage need identified in the master plan. Using creative thinking, an innovative “outside the box” solution was developed which included moving the existing sludge to one end
of the lagoon, isolating it with a geotextile reinforced containment berm, installing a cap and cover and closing the sludge cell in place. The remainder of the lagoon was then converted for use as a peak flow storage basin. This
Paper and Presentation will discuss: The innovative Sludge Lagoon Closure Concept The challenges and the results of the Site Assessment and Waste Characterization of the material in the
sludge lagoon The regulatory coordination necessary to arrive at the final Closure Plan The unique design and construction challenges involved in relocating and containing the sludge and
restoring the lagoon for use as a Peak Flow Storage Basin The cost savings and peak flow storage benefits recognized through using this innovative closure option compared to conventional removal and disposal options Some of the innovations and major elements of the project included: Special equipment and sampling techniques were required to access the remote portions of the lagoon and retrieve samples for the Site Investigation
and Waste Characterization. The environmental characterization was successfully completed and classified the sludge as a non-hazardous material. The sludge did have some elevated concentrations of metals that precluded agricultural land application and some other options as potential ultimate
disposal solutions. An innovative, on-site Closure Plan for the sludge storage lagoon was developed through close communication and coordination with the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) (now the Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality (TCEQ)), the state regulatory agency. A resourceful, carefully thought-out closure plan allowing on-site closure of the lagoon was prepared and presented to the TNRCC. This plan saved millions of dollars over the planned off-site closure cost. The Closure Plan demonstrated to the TNRCC
that on-site closure with no additional RCRA-type lining or leachate collection systems was a viable alternative, saving DWU additional closure costs. The variable consistency of the sludge material presented numerous challenges during the preparation
of design documents and implementing the actual construction of the project. The sludge varied from a soil like material with a vegetative cover on the surface of the lagoon, to a watery liquid at the bottom of the lagoon. The design incorporated the use of a variety of different geotextile
materials to ultimately contain the sludge and allow for the difficult materials handling tasks. The existing available peak flow detention volume was expanded from approximately 65 million gallons to an approximate peak flow detention volume of 215 million
gallons. The Peak Flow Detention System design incorporated multiple peak flow management schemes that maximized flexibility in the hydraulic operation and performance. The final peak flow detention system design incorporated three separate basins which operate as settling basins in series.
This design simplifies clean up maintenance after a storm event requires the basins to be used. It also provides the potential opportunity to apply innovative treatment processes options in the future to a dilute wastewater that has gone through a significant pre sedimentation treatment process.
That is, it may be possible to return the dilute, partially treated wastewater to a later stage in the treatment process train rather that back to the head of the plant. This could provide additional cost savings in the future. DWU also desired to have
an Emergency Biosolids Detention facility in the event that the planned biosolids pump station and force main between the Central Plant and the Southside Plant failed. The creative design also allowed for approximately ten MG of the current detention volume to be allocated to emergency detention
of biosolids as part of optional plant improvements. In addition to the cost savings associated with the on site Closure, substantial additional cost savings were recognized through Value Engineering on the project.
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed. WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.