Skip to main content

GASB'S STATEMENTS 34 AND 37 – NOT JUST FOR “OUR FRIENDS IN ACCOUNTING”

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

or click here to sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

The world of governmental financial management is in a state of fundamental transition. By its own admission, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board's (GASB) overhaul of its financial reporting model for governmental agencies, as codified in its Statements 34 and 37, is nothing short of revolutionary. The change is so wide-ranging, so massive, that implementation alone is scheduled over a seven year period, as measured from the date of adoption of Statement 34 by GASB.

Unfortunately, the tendency among many governmental managers is to regard GASB's pronouncements as consisting of “technical accountancy” issues, to be handled by the accounting staff and the independent auditor. Nothing could be farther from hard, cold reality or more deleterious to a career in the long run.

Through Statements 34 and 37, GASB is purposefully moving governmental financial reporting to more closely emulate private sector reporting. Private sector reporting is about fairly reporting the full cost and value of operations of the organization to shareholders, investors, creditors and employees by the management team. Failure to achieve and maintain a desired financial status as reported in the financial statements often leads to changes in management, even changes in Board members. This cause and effect relationship is not lost on GASB.

What is a “reporting model”? What exactly is “financial status” and how is it measured? How is financial status to be disclosed in the new reporting model? What impact does such reporting have for strategic organizational management? How does “Management's Discussion and Analysis” (MD&A) impact the senior management team? What impact will the valuation of capital assets have on enterprise organizations? What about asset management – will the new reporting requirements assist in funding “deferred maintenance”? And what about “depreciation” versus preservation – is GASB trending toward a disclosure of unfunded maintenance? What are the ramifications for the lending industry? How will it impact my rate structure? My bond rating? These and many other related questions should be on the mind of every utility manager.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864702785301673

Publication date: January 1, 2002

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
wef/wefproc/2002/00002002/00000004/art00053
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more