SELECTING THE OPTIMUM DELIVERY PROCESS

Authors: Schmidt, Harold E.; Layton, Troy E.; Rynning, Mark A.

Source: Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, WEF/AWWA Joint Management 2002 , pp. 64-74(11)

Publisher: Water Environment Federation

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Owners today are presented with many alternatives and options for constructing water and wastewater facilities, which include design/build, turnkey, and traditional procurement methods. Up until the middle of the 19th century, design/build was the predominant method of procurement in the United States. Through the years the process of constructing large public works infrastructure projects evolved into the current design, bid and build approach, or conventional bidding system format. Although the design/build and other procurement methods are today well-accepted procurement methods, they are individually some of the most misunderstood and misapplied methods for project delivery. To understand the alternative delivery procurement methods and strategies used, a fundamental understanding of the goals and objectives of the owner is required.

This paper will present a brief history of engineering and construction contracting through the ages and the roles of the design professional, contractor, and the owner. As these roles developed engineering and construction became separate, yet related disciplines. These roles developed into traditional relationships and into what we know as the traditional project delivery method. We have now come full circle with design and construction functions working together for complete project delivery.

This paper will also provide the reader with a process overview of the design/build and other procurement methods, coupled with advantages and disadvantages, as well as risks, associated with the traditional delivery method through the alternative delivery method. At the core of these issues are the relationships between the various parties (engineer, contractor and owner); the quality of the final constructed product; the owner's schedule and financial constraints; regulatory agencies' issues and uncertainties regarding alternative delivery methods; and the legal issues that govern alternative project delivery methods in the United States.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864702785301844

Publication date: January 1, 2002

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page