Skip to main content


Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

For many years, the behavior of the anaerobic digestion system at the Pembroke (ON) wastewater treatment plant was characteristic of a “stuck ”digester. The pH of the digester was low, in the range of 5.0 to 5.2, with minimal volatile solids reduction and digester gas production. A review of operating data and analytical records for the period 1997 – 1999 was initiated in an attempt to determine the causes of the process failure. Comparison of digester operating parameters with benchmark or guideline values helped to indicate some causative factors, including hydraulic and solids over-loading, and low alkalinity in the source water. Of particular note, however, was the low volatile acids concentration of less than 100 mg/L, expressed as acetic acid, in the digester. Analytical data indicated that while all traditional heavy metal concentrations were well below threshold inhibitory levels, the concentration of aluminum (from phosphorus removal) in the digester was at or above the range in which inhibition could occur. Significantly, the inhibitory action of aluminum is on the acid-forming bacteria, rather than on the methane-formers, which usually are the most sensitive group of bacteria in an anaerobic digester. A number of corrective measures were taken to resurrect the digestion process, including temporary cessation of alum dosage, re-seeding the primary digester with a mix of raw wastewater and secondary digested sludge, addition of alkalinity chemicals and urea (for ammonia), and, later, replacement of over-sized raw sludge pumps and substitution of alum with pre-hydroxylated aluminum sulfate. While the measures caused the digester to operate normally, adverse effects from the corrective measures were felt in the primary clarifiers due to a decline in supernatant quality, and in a decline in dewaterability of the digested solids by the plant's belt filter press. The study has shown that the processes of a wastewater treatment plant do not operate in isolation, and that changes to one process may have unintended and unwanted impacts on other processes.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2001-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more