If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Flow Meter Technology Assessment: A Three–Year Evaluation of Seven Common Meter Technologies found in the DWSD Collection System

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


A highly accurate dye dilution testing protocol using Rhodamine WT was developed and used to quantify flow meter accuracy in the Greater Detroit Regional Sewer System. Over 150 tests were performed on 37 flow meters in conjunction with a set of good metering practice principles. A summary of the accuracy for each of the seven technologies tested observed before and after good metering practice is given. Also presented is a summary of flow meter manufacturer presentations hosted to explore accuracy issues and proper application of six commonly used technologies. The seven technologies assessed are electromagnetic induction meters (magmeters); full-conduit, multiple-path, transit-time meters; full-conduit, single-path, transit-time meters; openchannel, multiple-path, transit-time meters; open-channel, ultrasonic meters; flumes; and weirs. Many meters that are typically considered to be accurate had errors of more than 30%. Some meters had errors that exceeded 70%.

Overall, the average initial system accuracy for system meters was observed to be ±15.0% of measurement with an overall bias of 6.1% (under-predicting flow). After implementing the good metering practice principles, and in particular using dye dilution testing as a diagnostic tool, the average accuracy potential observed for the system reduced to ±5.5% of measurement, with an overall bias of 0.6% (under-predicting flow). It is concluded that: 1) there are observable accuracy differences between flow meter technologies, 2) objective standards like dye dilution testing are critical to good metering, 3) verifying installed accuracy is important, even for technologies considered to be highly accurate, and 4) the simplest technology that can be used is often the best.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/193864700784608649

Publication date: January 1, 2000

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites



Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more