Skip to main content

UNDERSTANDING THE RESPONSE OF ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL BIOMASS TO A RANGE OF ORGANIC SUBSTRATES

Buy Article:

$9.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Anaerobic/aerobic batch experiments were conducted with a variety of volatile fatty (VFAs) on two sequencing batch reactor (SBR) populations displaying Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR). The batch experiments were fairly consistent between the two systems and with the past literature: acetic and isovaleric acid were the most efficient substrates with respect to increasing net phosphorus (P) removals, and valeric and propionic acid were less efficient than these two VFAs. The fundamental reason was because both isovaleric and acetic acid resulted in predominantly 3HB storage as opposed to 3HV. 3HB content correlated with higher aerobic P uptake per unit PHA (i.e. ƒP,UPT using the nomenclature of Barker and Dold, 1997) than 3HV. It was also noted that 3HB content had an inverse relationship with carbohydrate/glycogen biosynthesis during aerobiosis. Thus it may be that ƒP,UPT was not different for 3HB vs. 3HV, but that ƒP,UPT is different depending on the fate of PHA carbon (i.e. does it go to glycogen, CO2, or is it used for maintenance). The model of Smolders et al. (1995) for acetic acid transformation to 3HB implies that ƒP,UPT would be lower if the fraction of PHA carbon shunted to glycogen increased relative to that dedicated to polyphosphate biosynthesis. By inference this data also indicated that a simple correlation between negative redox balance of VFA→PHA transformation and high net P removals was probably coincidence and the negative redox balance was not the cause. This was confirmed because low PHA biosynthesis for substrates with positive redox balances did not occur. SBR data implied that acetate/propionate ratio is potentially a significant parameter with respect to EBPR and biological nutrient removal (BNR) system performance, and by implication design and modeling.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2000-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation includes access to most papers presented at the annual WEF Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) and other conferences held since 2000. Subscription access begins 12 months after the event and is valid for 12 months from month of purchase. A subscription to the Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is included in Water Environment Federation (WEF) membership.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access. Access begins 12 months after the conference or event
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Learn about the many other WEF member benefits and join today
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more