Skip to main content

AN ASSESSMENT OF THE BIOASSAY CONCEPT FOR UV REACTOR VALIDATION

Buy Article:

$17.50 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

While UV dose delivered by UV reactors is often expressed as the product of the average UV intensity within the reactor and the theoretical residence time, several authors have pointed out that hydraulic profiles and intensity gradients within UV reactors give rise to a distribution of delivered doses as opposed to a fixed value (Qualls et al, 1989; Scheible, 1985; Chiu et al, 1997). Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has been advocated as the best and possibly only way to fully characterize dose distributions delivered by UV reactors. In this paper, CFD predictions of dose distributions are made for several UV reactor configurations. Predictions of the inactivation of Cryptosporidium, E. coli, rotavirus, and MS2 bacteriophage by those reactors are made assuming first order kinetics and published inactivation constants. Predictions of fecal coliform inactivation by those reactors are also made using biphasic UV dose-response inactivation kinetics obtained with various wastewaters and measured using a collimated beam apparatus. The inactivation achieved is compared to collimated beam dose-response data to estimate the delivered UV dose that would have been predicted if the reactors were assessed using bioassay methods. It is shown that the bioassay dose varies depending on the inactivation constant of the challenge microbe and that this variance increases as the reactor deviates more from the ideal hydraulic condition of plug flow with radial mixing. The results show that UV doses predicted using bioassay methods may be easily misinterpreted if due consideration is not paid to ensure that the challenge microbe has inactivation kinetics similar to the indicator microbe or pathogen being targeted by regulations. An interpretation for bioassay results is proposed and its implication for compliance with drinking and wastewater regulations discussed. A modified bioassay procedure is recommended.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2175/193864700785372460

Publication date: 2000-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation is an archive of papers published in the proceedings of the annual Water Environment Federation® Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC® ) and specialty conferences held since the year 2000. These proceedings are not peer reviewed.

    WEF Members: Sign in (right panel) with your IngentaConnect user name and password to receive complimentary access.
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • About WEF Proceedings
  • WEFTEC Conference Information
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more