Comment on 'Angle illusion on a picture's surface' by Hammad et al. (2008)
Author: Maniatis, Lydia M.
Source: Spatial Vision, Volume 22, Number 6, 2009 , pp. 555-558(4)
Publisher: VSP, an imprint of Brill
Abstract:
Hammad et al.'s (2008) conclusions as to the basis of angle illusions on a picture's surface are not justified by their data, which cannot in principle differentiate between their proposal and the proposed alternatives.Keywords: PERSPECTIVE; PICTORIAL PERCEPTION; FORESHORTENING; GESTALT; CONVERGENCE
Document Type: Short communication
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856809789822952
Affiliations: 1: Psychology Department, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Avenue, Washington DC 20016, USA
Publication date: 2009-12-01
- For more content see: Seeing and Perceiving.
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Biology , Optics & Light , Psychology
- By this author: Maniatis, Lydia M.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions