Authors: Berzhanskaya, J.¹; Grossberg, S.²; Mingolla, E.²

Source: Spatial Vision, Volume 20, Number 4, 2007 , pp. 337-395(59)

Publisher: VSP, an imprint of Brill

Abstract:

How do visual form and motion processes cooperate to compute object motion when each process separately is insufficient? Consider, for example, a deer moving behind a bush. Here the partially occluded fragments of motion signals available to an observer must be coherently grouped into the motion of a single object. A 3D FORMOTION model comprises five important functional interactions involving the brain's form and motion systems that address such situations. Because the model's stages are analogous to areas of the primate visual system, we refer to the stages by corresponding anatomical names. In one of these functional interactions, 3D boundary representations, in which figures are separated from their backgrounds, are formed in cortical area V2. These depth-selective V2 boundaries select motion signals at the appropriate depths in MT via V2-to-MT signals. In another, motion signals in MT disambiguate locally incomplete or ambiguous boundary signals in V2 via MT-to-V1-to-V2 feedback. The third functional property concerns resolution of the aperture problem along straight moving contours by propagating the influence of unambiguous motion signals generated at contour terminators or corners. Here, sparse 'feature tracking signals' from, for example, line ends are amplified to overwhelm numerically superior ambiguous motion signals along line segment interiors. In the fourth, a spatially anisotropic motion grouping process takes place across perceptual space via MT-MST feedback to integrate veridical feature-tracking and ambiguous motion signals to determine a global object motion percept. The fifth property uses the MT-MST feedback loop to convey an attentional priming signal from higher brain areas back to V1 and V2. The model's use of mechanisms such as divisive normalization, endstopping, cross-orientation inhibition, and long-range cooperation is described. Simulated data include: the degree of motion coherence of rotating shapes observed through apertures, the coherent vs. element motion percepts separated in depth during the chopsticks illusion, and the rigid vs. nonrigid appearance of rotating ellipses.

Keywords: MOTION PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL GROUPING; PRESTRIATE CORTEX; V1; V2; MT; MST

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156856807780919000

Affiliations: 1: Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, 22030, USA 2: Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Center for Adaptive Systems and Center of Excellence for Learning in Education, Science, and Technology, Boston University, 677 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA

Publication date: 2007-07-01

More about this publication?

• For more content see: Seeing and Perceiving.

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Biology ,  Optics & Light ,  Psychology
• By this author: Berzhanskaya, J. ;  Grossberg, S. ;  Mingolla, E.

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers