Skip to main content

Incentives in Best of N Contests: Quasi-Simpson's Paradox in Tennis

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

Simpson's Paradox is a statistical quirk where an apparent correlation of variables is reversed when the variables are combined. We investigate tennis' unique “best of N” scoring system for evidence of Simpson's Paradox among certain players who win more points than their opponent but lose the overall match. Using data from more than 61,000 professional tennis matches over the course of 21 years, we find about 4.5% of matches exhibit such characteristics, providing insight into incentive effects derived from tennis' scoring system, (sub-)conscious strategic decisions by players, and player-level traits that may be relevant to match outcomes. Practical implications in connection with sport integrity and narrow aspects of the sports gambling market are also discussed.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: INCENTIVES; SCORING SYSTEMS; STATISTICAL QUIRKS; TENNIS

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2013-12-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more