The constraints of body size on aerodynamics and energetics in flying fruit flies: an integrative view

Author: Lehmann F-O.

Source: Zoology, Volume 105, Number 4, December 2002 , pp. 287-295(9)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $29.27 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Reynolds number and thus body size may potentially limit aerodynamic force production in flying insects due to relative changes of viscous forces on the beating wings. By comparing four different species of fruit flies similar in shape but with different body mass, we have investigated how small insects cope with changes in fluid mechanical constraints on power requirements for flight and the efficiency with which chemical energy is turned into aerodynamic flight forces. The animals were flown in a flight arena in which stroke kinematics, aerodynamic force production, and carbon dioxide release were measured within the entire working range of the flight motor. The data suggest that during hovering performance mean lift coefficient for flight is higher in smaller animals than in their larger relatives. This result runs counter to predictions based on conventional aerodynamic theory and suggests subtle differences in stroke kinematics between the animals. Estimates in profile power requirements based on high drag coefficient suggest that among all tested species of fruit flies elastic energy storage might not be required to minimize energetic expenditures during flight. Moreover, muscle efficiency significantly increases with increasing body size whereas aerodynamic efficiency tends to decrease with increasing size or Reynolds number. As a consequence of these two opposite trends, total flight efficiency tends to increase only slightly within the 6-fold range of body sizes. Surprisingly, total flight efficiency in fruit flies is broadly independent of different profile power estimates and typically yields mean values between 2–4%.

Keywords: scaling; lift coefficient; power requirements; muscle efficiency; Drosophila

Language: English

Document Type: Miscellaneous

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/0944-2006-00083

Affiliations: 1: BioFuture Research Group, Department of Neurobiology, University of Ulm, Germany

Publication date: 2002-12-01