Skip to main content

Free Content An appraisal of two coral reef rapid monitoring manuals for gathering baseline data

Download Article:
 Download
(PDF 167 kb)
 

Abstract:

There is concern worldwide that many coral reefs are suffering degradation and loss of biodiversity. In response, some rapid coral reef health monitoring manuals have been developed that purport to have wide biogeographical applicability and user friendliness. These manuals however, have been little tested in areas beyond their centers of origin. This study uses two of the manuals (involving line-intercept transects; English et al., 1997) and corallivorous chaetodont behavior (Crosby and Reese, 1996) to do a first, expeditionary assessment on a relatively inaccessible coral reef in the Seychelles, Western Indian Ocean. Future revisions of the manuals should perhaps consider the following points as extra guidance for newcomers to the methodologies. At any one time and site, at least ten, rather than five, transects should be done. Sensitivity of many fishes to line-transect diver activities suggests that the Stationary Visual Census Method is much preferred to line-intercept counts. Line-intercept coral data are well-illustrated by simple rank-abundance curves, flagged with species identifications. Such curves also apply well to specific fish taxa, but not to the general fish assemblage. Statistical correlations between fishes and benthos cannot be done from line-intercept data within transects as they are not independent variables, and this should be made explicit in the manuals. Stationary visual censuses would overcome this problem. Data gathered according to the practical manuals are amenable to multivariate analysis. Clarke and Warwick's (1994) manual and associated software is strongly recommended for follow-up analysis. Obligate corallivorous butterflyfishes clearly have potential for monitoring coral reef health but that the metric requires calibration and cross-referencing with other metrics. Further recommendations on coral reef health monitoring relative to the manuals are given, with emphasis on the importance of clearly defining the biodiversity and conservation questions before monitoring is started.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: September 1, 2001

More about this publication?
  • The Bulletin of Marine Science is dedicated to the dissemination of high quality research from the world's oceans. All aspects of marine science are treated by the Bulletin of Marine Science, including papers in marine biology, biological oceanography, fisheries, marine affairs, applied marine physics, marine geology and geophysics, marine and atmospheric chemistry, and meteorology and physical oceanography.
  • Editorial Board
  • Information for Authors
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
umrsmas/bullmar/2001/00000069/00000002/art00020
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more