Animal Welfare

Perspectives of animal welfare at farm and group level: Introduction and overview
pp. 105-105(1)
Authors: Winckler, C.; Baumgartner, J.; Waiblinger, S.

Normal behaviour as a basis for animal welfare assessment
pp. 107-110(4)
Author: Wechsler, B.

Experimental welfare assessment and on-farm application
pp. 111-115(5)
Author: Edwards, S.A.

The journey to animal welfare improvement
pp. 117-122(6)
Author: Whay, H.R.

Sickness behaviour and its relevance to animal welfare assessment at the group level
pp. 123-125(3)
Author: Millman, S.T.

Reliability of a subjective lameness scoring system for dairy cows
pp. 127-129(3)
Authors: Brenninkmeyer, C.; Dippel, S.; March, S.; Brinkmann, J.; Winckler, C.; Knierim, U.

Effect of training on the inter-observer reliability of lameness scoring in dairy cattle
pp. 131-133(3)
Authors: March, S.; Brinkmann, J.; Winkler, C.

Early detection of lameness in heifers with hairy heel warts using a pressure plate
pp. 135-137(3)
Authors: Almeida, P.E.; Mullineaux, D.R.; Raphael, W.; Wickens, C.; Zanella, A.J.

Human and animal behaviour in dairy buffalo at milking
pp. 139-142(4)
Authors: Saltalamacchia, F.; Tripaldi, C.; Castellano, A.; Napolitano, F.; Musto, M.; De Rosa, G.

Assessing the animals' relationship to humans in tied dairy cows: between-experimenter repeatability of measuring avoidance reactions
pp. 143-146(4)
Authors: Waiblinger, S.; Mülleder, C.; Schmied, C.; Dembele, I.

Attitudes of farmers towards Limousin cattle and their handling
pp. 147-151(5)
Authors: Boivin, X.; Marcantognini, L.; Boulesteix, P.; Godet, J.; Brulé, A.; Veissier, I.

Can environmental variables replace some animal-based parameters in welfare assessment of dairy cows?
pp. 153-156(4)
Authors: Mülleder, C.; Troxler, J.; Laaha, G.; Waiblinger, S.

Evaluation of the acute phase protein haptoglobin as an indicator of herd health in slaughter pigs
pp. 157-159(3)
Authors: van den Berg, A.; Danuser, J.; Frey, J.; Regula, G.

Potential animal-centred indicators of dairy goat welfare
pp. 161-164(4)
Authors: Mazurek, M.; Marie, M.; Desor, D.

How to deal with complex data of skin lesions in weaner pigs
pp. 165-168(4)
Author: Baumgartner, J.

Measuring fearfulness of hens in commercial organic egg production
pp. 169-171(3)
Authors: Hegelund, L.; Sørensen, J.T.

Development of on-farm methods to assess the animal-human relationship in laying hens kept in non-cage systems
pp. 173-175(3)
Authors: Raubek, J.; Niebuhr, K.; Waiblinger, S.

Validation of broiler chicken gait scoring training in Thailand, Brazil and New Zealand
pp. 177-179(3)
Authors: Butterworth, A.; Knowles, T.G.; Whittington, P.; Matthews, L.; Rogers, A.; Bagshaw, C.S.

Repeatability of a skin tent test for dehydration in working horses and donkeys
pp. 181-183(3)
Authors: Pritchard, J.C.; Barr, A.R.S.; Whay, H.R.

Can sleep behaviour be used as an indicator of stress in group-housed rats (Rattus norvegicus)?
pp. 185-188(4)
Authors: Abou-Ismail, U.A.; Burman, O.H.P.; Nicol, C.J.; Mendl, M.

Welfare assessment in extensive animal production systems: challenges and opportunities
pp. 189-192(4)
Authors: Turner, S.P.; Dwyer, C.M.

Testing different methods to evaluate pig welfare on farm
pp. 193-196(4)
Authors: Courboulay, V.; Foubert, C.

Long-term consistency of selected animal-related welfare parameters in dairy farms
pp. 197-199(3)
Authors: Winckler, C.; Brinkmann, J.; Glatz, J.

Evaluation of parameters for monitoring welfare during transport and lairage at the abattoir in pigs
pp. 201-204(4)
Authors: Fàbrega, E.; Coma, J.; Tibau, J.; Manteca, X.; Velarde, A.

On-farm assessment of the lying behaviour of finishing bulls kept in housing systems with different floor qualities
pp. 205-208(4)
Authors: Gygax, L.; Mayer, C.; Westerath, H Schulze; Friedli, K.; Wechsler, B.

Preliminary assessment of finishing pig welfare using animal-based measurements
pp. 209-211(3)
Authors: Whay, H.R.; Leeb, C.; Main, D.C.J.; Green, L.E.; Webster, A.J.F.

Evaluation of a welfare indicator protocol for assessing animal welfare in AMS herds: researcher, production advisor and veterinary practitioner opinion
pp. 213-216(4)
Authors: Rousing, T.; Jakobsen, I.A.; Hindhede, J.; Klaas, I.C.; Bonde, M.; Sørensen, J.T.

Results of the Animal Needs Index (ANI-35L) compared to animal-based parameters in free-range and organic laying hen flocks in Austria
pp. 217-219(3)
Authors: Zaludik, K.; Lugmair, A.; Baumung, R.; Troxler, J.; Niebuhr, K.

Welfare assessment on Japanese dairy farms using the Animal Needs Index
pp. 221-223(3)
Authors: Seo, T.; Date, K.; Daigo, T.; Kashiwamura, F.; Sato, S.

Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare
pp. 225-228(4)
Authors: Botreau, R.; Veissier, I.; Butterworth, A.; Bracke, M.B.M.; Keeling, L.J.

Animal-based parameters are no panacea for on-farm monitoring of animal welfare
pp. 229-231(3)
Author: Bracke, M.B.M.

Formal animal-based welfare assessment in UK certification schemes
pp. 233-236(4)
Authors: Main, D.C.J.; Whay, H.R.; Leeb, C.; Webster, A.J.F.

On-farm welfare assessment systems: what are the recording costs?
pp. 237-239(3)
Authors: Sørensen, J.T.; Rousing, T.; Møller, S.H.; Bonde, M.; Hegelund, L.

Leveraging expertise in animal welfare to create educational equity
pp. 241-243(3)
Authors: Siegford, J.M.; Zanella, A.J.; Bernardo, T.; Heleski, C.R.; Wickens, C.L.; Laughlin, K.; Malinowski, R.

Self-evaluation of animal welfare by the farmer: a report of application on Austrian cattle farms
pp. 245-248(4)
Authors: Ofner, E.; Schmid, E.; Schröck, E.; Troxler, J.; Hausleitner, A.

Bridging consumer perception and on-farm assessment of animal welfare
pp. 249-253(5)
Authors: Napolitano, F.; De Rosa, G.; Caporale, G.; Carlucci, A.; Grasso, F.; Monteleone, E.

Rank correlated use of soft flooring by dairy cattle
pp. 255-257(3)
Authors: Platz, S.; Ahrens, F.; Bendel, J.; Meyer, H.; Erhard, M.H.

Effects of fattening boars in mixed or single sex groups and split marketing on pig welfare
pp. 259-262(4)
Authors: Boyle, L.A.; Björklund, L.

Relation between parity and feed intake, fear of humans and social behaviour in non-lactating sows group-housed under various on-farm conditions
pp. 263-266(4)
Authors: Kongsted, A.G.; Hermansen, J.E.; Kristensen, T.

Using the Piglet Scream Test to enhance piglet survival on farms: data from outdoor sows
pp. 267-271(5)
Authors: Held, S.; Mason, G.; Mendl, M.

Peripartal behaviour and teat lesions of sows in farrowing crates and in a loose-housing system
pp. 273-276(4)
Authors: Verhovsek, D.; Troxler, J.; Baumgartner, J.

Piglet mortality on farms using farrowing systems with or without crates
pp. 277-279(3)
Authors: Weber, R.; Keil, N.M.; Fehr, M.; Horat, R.

Protective behaviour of Konik horses in response to insect harassment
pp. 281-283(3)
Authors: Górecka, A.; Jezierski, T.

Reports and Comments
pp. 285-287(3)

Book Reviews
pp. 289-294(6)