Skip to main content

Framing unpopular policies and creating policy winners: the role of heresthetics

Buy Article:

The full text article is not available for purchase.

The publisher only permits individual articles to be downloaded by subscribers.

This article deals with a critical challenge for policymakers: how can political actors become policy winners in areas where they have previously experienced resounding losses? To address this puzzle, the article develops William Riker’s concept of heresthetic, which describes how clever actors can disrupt the equilibrium of the political opposition by re-framing people’s choices in such a way that they are inclined to contribute to their cause. Specifically, we propose a new analytical framework that enables scholars to trace and explain the various strategies available to politicians who seek to advance seemingly detrimental or risky policies in circumstances of uncertainty and complexity. This is applied to the surprising case of education reforms advanced by Australia’s Liberal–National Coalition. In doing so, the article affirms the importance of vicarious instruction for aspiring herestheticians, the media, and the citizens whom they seek to manipulate.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Australia; education; reform; rhetoric

Affiliations: 1: Institute for Public Policy and Governance, University of Technology Sydney, Australia 2: Department of Business Administration, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan 3: Institute for Public Policy and Governance, University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Appeared or available online: 24 May 2018

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more