Institutionally homophobic? Political parties and the substantive representation of LGBT people: Westminster and regional UK elections 1945–2011
Abstract:This article explores the substantive representation of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in party manifestos in general elections and regional elections in the United Kingdom, 1945–2011. The findings show that while there is some evidence of progress, there is also significant variation in the attention that parties afford to LGBT issues, and a general failure to fully apply international principles and mainstreaming theory in election programmes. It is argued that an 'asymmetrical electoral bargain' applies: parties increasingly court LGBT voters yet often do so in a reductive and limited manner. This suggests that elements of institutionally homophobic practice endure in contemporary electoral politics.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2013
An International Journal
Policy & Politics is the leading journal in the field of public policy with an enviable reputation for publishing peer-reviewed papers of the highest quality. It explores the fit between theory and empirical applications and links macro-scale political economy debates with micro-scale policy studies.
Access to the complete newly-digitised Policy & Politics backfile is now available via premium subscriptions. Visit http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap_subscribe.asp for more information.
Visit http://www.policypress.co.uk/PPcollections.asp to see Policy & Politics' virtual collections.
Policy & Politics fast track articles are available before the published issues allowing you access to the latest research as soon as possible.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Policy & Politics fast track articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites