'Truth' junkies: using evaluation in UK public policy
Author: Sullivan, Helen
Source: Policy & Politics, Volume 39, Number 4, October 2011 , pp. 499-512(14)
Publisher: Policy Press
Abstract:This article explores the relationships of policy makers and academic evaluators with each other and with evaluation over the life of the United Kingdom's (UK) New Labour. Drawing on experience of central government-funded evaluations and employing insights from governance and governmentality theories, it illustrates how the idea of evaluation as a source of 'truth' was valorised by policy makers as a means of dealing with emergent doubt, delineates the competing manifestations of 'truth' that were negotiated in the context of 'new governance', and reviews the contribution of new evaluation approaches to uncovering evidence of 'the truth'. The article concludes that, despite considerable investment in UK policy evaluation, a disconnection between 'evidence' and 'argument' has limited the role of academic evaluators in the policy process.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: October 2011
- An International Journal
Policy & Politics is the leading journal in the field of public policy with an enviable reputation for publishing peer-reviewed papers of the highest quality. It explores the fit between theory and empirical applications and links macro-scale political economy debates with micro-scale policy studies.
Access to the complete newly-digitised Policy & Politics backfile is now available via premium subscriptions. Visit http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap_subscribe.asp? for more information.
Policy & Politics fast track articles are available before the published issues allowing you access to the latest research as soon as possible.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Policy & Politics fast track articles
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites