Skip to main content

Twenty years post US welfare reform and state family caps aka child exclusion: an overdue assessment

Buy Article:

$25.58 plus tax (Refund Policy)

The 1996 welfare reform legislation sought to discourage poor women from childbearing by allowing a family-cap policy prohibiting an increase in cash assistance when a new child is born. We conducted key-informant interviews with officials from all 24 family-cap states on the policy’s status, implementation, opinions regarding its effectiveness, benefits and disadvantages. Most stated that the policy’s administrative burden and negative economic impact on poor families outweighed its potential benefits. Some states implemented related policies that further undermined family wellbeing and/or did not adopt the Medicaid expansion increasing access to family planning, revealing a punitive social policy of questionable effectiveness.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: key-informant interviews; poverty; reproductive rights; social justice; welfare reform

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: CUNY, New York, USA 2: Harvard, Boston, USA

Publication date: 01 June 2018

This article was made available online on 18 March 2018 as a Fast Track article with title: "Twenty years post US welfare reform and state family caps aka child exclusion: an overdue assessment ".

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
UA-1313315-21
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more