Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward
Authors: Thomas, James; Newman, Mark; Oliver, Sandy
Source: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, Volume 9, Number 1, January 2013 , pp. 5-27(23)
Publisher: Policy Press
Abstract:There is a tension between conducting comprehensive systematic reviews and completing them in time to meet policy-making deadlines. The 'rapid evidence assessment' has been proposed as a solution to this; offering rigorous reviews in a condensed timescale. While used frequently in healthcare, this mode of reviewing presents considerable challenges in social policy. We describe some potential problems and suggest reviewing strategies that can overcome some of them. There are situations, however, in which it may not be feasible to embark on a rapid review, and caution should be exercised when selecting this method.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: January 1, 2013
- Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Evidence & Policy fast track articles
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites