Skip to main content

Use of evidence from systematic reviews to inform commissioning decisions: a case study

Buy Article:

$37.72 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Abstract:

Systematic reviews provide high-level evidence but there are barriers to their use by policy makers. This paper reports the preparation and evaluation of an evidence briefing, using systematic reviews and other existing sources of synthesised evidence, to support a possible reorganisation of services for young people with eating disorders in an English primary care trust. There was no evidence of differences in outcomes between community, outpatient and specialist inpatient treatment. The provision of specialist outpatient services appeared most cost-effective. The commissioning group agreed to move towards providing services on an outpatient basis. This work suggests that evidence briefings based on systematic reviews warrant further methodological development and evaluation.

Keywords: ANOREXIA NERVOSA; ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS; SERVICE DELIVERY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426412X640054

Publication date: May 1, 2012

More about this publication?
tpp/ep/2012/00000008/00000002/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
UA-1313315-21
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more