Reconstructing and assessing the evaluation logic of the dutch Closed Criminal Cases Evaluation Commission: report of a meta-evaluation
Abstract:In this paper, we offer an account of the meta-evaluation of a special administrative arrangement, the Dutch Closed Criminal Cases Evaluation Commission (Dutch acronym: CEAS). The CEAS is a provisional evaluation institution meant to investigate alleged missteps during criminal investigation and prosecution, which may have caused the conviction of an innocent person
We developed a tailor-made approach to reconstruct the commission's 'evaluation logic'; this is illustrated by reconstructing the activities of a selection committee and two investigative subcommittees of the CEAS. Subsequently, we applied a set of criteria to assess among others the timeliness, independence and transparency of the commission's work. We offer a number of conclusions and recommendations, particularly with regard to future (meta-)evaluation research.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: November 1, 2010
Evidence & Policy is the first peer-reviewed journal dedicated to comprehensive and critical assessment of the relationship between research evidence and the concerns of policy makers and practitioners, as well as researchers.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Policy Press journals homepage
- Evidence & Policy fast track articles
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites