Skip to main content

Setting the research agenda for health services management practice: who decides?

Buy Article:

$26.25 plus tax (Refund Policy)

The value of research to society depends not only on its intrinsic quality but also on topic selection. Because it is difficult to assess objectively the value of topic selection, research funders develop transparent processes for research needs assessment and prioritisation. In this paper, these processes are analysed for one publicly funded research commissioner in England, paying attention to the positioning of the programme within national institutions and with discussion of some historical antecedents. The dynamics between interest groups with a stake in the programme are identified. Different strategies for balancing stakeholder interests are described and their relative merits discussed. The conclusion is that no one strategy can be effective in isolation and a mixed approach is needed.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH PRIORITISATION; RESEARCH USE

Document Type: Regular Paper

Publication date: 2010-01-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
UA-1313315-21
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more