Setting the research agenda for health services management practice: who decides?

$39.86 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Or sign up for a free trial

Buy Article:

Abstract:

The value of research to society depends not only on its intrinsic quality but also on topic selection. Because it is difficult to assess objectively the value of topic selection, research funders develop transparent processes for research needs assessment and prioritisation. In this paper, these processes are analysed for one publicly funded research commissioner in England, paying attention to the positioning of the programme within national institutions and with discussion of some historical antecedents. The dynamics between interest groups with a stake in the programme are identified. Different strategies for balancing stakeholder interests are described and their relative merits discussed. The conclusion is that no one strategy can be effective in isolation and a mixed approach is needed.

Keywords: PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH NEEDS ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH PRIORITISATION; RESEARCH USE

Document Type: Regular Paper

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426410X483033

Publication date: January 1, 2010

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
UA-1313315-21
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more