Open Access An Ultrafine, Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter and its Evaluation under Field Conditions

Authors: Iida, Kenjiro1; Stolzenburg, Mark1; McMurry, Peter1; Smith, James2; Quant, Frederick3; Oberreit, Derek3; Keady, Patricia3; Eiguren-Fernandez, Arantza4; Lewis, Gregory5; Kreisberg, Nathan5; Hering, Susanne5

Source: Aerosol Science and Technology, Volume 42, Number 10, October 2008 , pp. 862-871(10)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Buy & download fulltext article:

Open Access The full text is Open Access.

View now:
PDF

Abstract:

An ultrafine, water-based condensation particle counter (U-WCPC, TSI Model 3786) has been compared to a butanol-based ultrafine counter (U-BCPC, TSI Model 3025) for measurement of atmospheric and freeway-tunnel aerosols. The U-WCPC utilizes a warm, wet-walled growth tube to activate and grow particles through water condensation in a laminar-flow. It has an aerosol sampling rate of 0.3 L/min, and a nominal detection limit near 3 nm. Several field comparisons were made to the butanol-based instrument with the same nominal detection limit. For measurements of size-selected aerosols with diameters of 5 nm and larger the two instruments generally agreed, with a mean response within 5%. At 3 nm particle size differences were observed, and these differences varied with the data set. Measurements of ambient aerosol in Boulder, Colorado showed higher counting efficiency at 3 nm with the U-BCPC, while in a California freeway tunnel the opposite trend was observed, with higher counting efficiencies at 3 nm observed by the U-WCPC. For direct measurement of atmospheric aerosols, the two types of instruments yielded equivalent concentrations, independent of particle number concentration.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802339579

Affiliations: 1: Mechanical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA 2: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA 3: Quant Technologies LLC, Blaine, Minnesota, USA 4: University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA 5: Aerosol Dynamics Inc., Berkeley, California, USA

Publication date: 2008-10-01

More about this publication?

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page