If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

Open Access PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 Characteristics in the Roadside Environment of Hong Kong

(PDF 1,986.5kb)
Download Article:


Daily mass concentrations of PM 1.0 (particles less than 1.0 µm in diameter), PM 2.5 (particles less than 2.5 µm in diameter), organic carbon (OC), and elemental carbon (EC) were measured from January through May 2004 at a heavily trafficked sampling site in Hong Kong (PU). The average concentrations for PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 were 35.9 ± 12.4 µ g cm - 3 and 52.3 ± 18.3 µ g cm - 3 . Carbonaceous aerosols were the dominant species in fine particles, accounting for ~ 45.7% of PM 1.0 and ~ 44.4% of PM 2.5 . During the study period, seven fine-particle episodes occurred, due to the influence of long-range transport of air masses from mainland China. PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 responded in similar ways; i.e., with elevated mass and OC concentrations in those episode days. During the sampling period, PM 1.0 OC and EC generally behaved similarly to the carbonaceous aerosols in PM 2.5 , regardless of seasonal variations and influence by regional pollutions. The low and relatively constant OC/EC ratios in PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 indicated that vehicular emissions were major sources of carbonaceous aerosols. PM 1.0 and PM 2.5 had the same dominant sources of vehicular emissions in winter, while in spring PM 2.5 was more influenced by PM 1 - 2.5 (particles 1–2.5 µ m in diameter) that did not form from vehicle exhausts. Therefore, PM 1.0 was a better indicator for vehicular emissions at the Roadside Station.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500494544

Affiliations: 1: Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Research Center for Environmental Technology and Management, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China 2: State Key Laboratory of Loess & Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, China 3: Hong Kong Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong, China 4: Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, USA

Publication date: March 1, 2006

More about this publication?
Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more