The Effects of Microbiotic Soil Crustson Soil Water Loss

Authors: GEORGE D.B.1; ROUNDY B.A.1; ST. CLAIR L.L.1; JOHANSEN J.R.2; SCHAALJE G.B.3; WEBB B.L.4

Source: Arid Land Research and Management, Volume 17, Number 2, April-June 2003 , pp. 113-125(13)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $56.94 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Microbiotic soil crusts play several important roles in many arid and semiarid ecosystems around the world. Their effects on soil hydrology, however, are poorly understood. It has been speculated that crusts (1) improve soil water availability by "sealing" the soil surface to water loss, or (2) diminish soil water by increasing the latent heat of a soil profile thereby increasing evaporation. In order to distinguish between these two opposing hypotheses, we analyzed water loss and temperature of soil profiles covered by different types of microbiotic soil crust (cyanobacteria, Psora decipiens, Placidium squamulosum) and a bare soil. We conducted experiments under growth chamber and field conditions. After watering to field capacity, surfaces (1-3 cm deep) of crusted soils took as long or longer to decrease to -1.5 MPa water potential as bare soil in both the growth chamber and the field. In the growth chamber, soils covered by each of the crust types took longer to dry than bare soil. In the field, soils covered by cyanobacteria took longer to dry than bare soils or those covered by the other crusts. Daily soil temperature was not different among the different crust types and bare soil in either experiment. This study did not support the hypothesis that crusts dry a soil profile more quickly by increasing the amount of energy available for evaporation. Rather our data suggested that crusts increase soil water availability by increasing water flux resistance, specifically at the soil surface.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Botany and Range Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA 2: Department of Biology, John Carroll University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 3: Department of Statistics, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA 4: Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA

Publication date: 2003-04-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page