Skip to main content

Uncertainties in radiative transfer computations: consequences on the MERIS products over land

Buy Article:

$63.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

The main objectives of MERIS (MEdium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer) consist of atmospheric processes related to the water vapour column and aerosol optical properties designed for meteorological applications, and the land surface properties as well as the bio‐optical oceanography. In this context, operational MERIS level‐2 processing uses auxiliary data generated by two radiative transfer tools. These two codes simulate upwelling radiances within a coupled ‘atmosphere–land' system, using different approaches based on the matrix‐operator method (FUB, Freie Universität Berlin), the discrete ordinate method and the successive orders technique (ULCO, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale). Intervalidation of these two radiative transfer tools was performed in order to implement them in the MERIS level‐2 processing. For cases without gaseous absorption, the scattering processes both by the molecules and the aerosols were retrieved within a few tenths of a percentage point. Nevertheless, some substantial discrepancies occur if the polarization is not accounted for, mainly in the Rayleigh scattering computations. Errors on the aerosol optical thickness reach up to 25% in some geometries as observed in the MERIS images. The parametrization of gaseous absorption (H 2 O and O 2 ) defined for each of these two codes leads to a good agreement for the MERIS bands with residual absorption. In the strong absorption bands (761.75 nm and 900 nm), the FUB computations well match the results derived from a line‐by‐line (LBL) code with a very high spectral resolution. Note that the oxygen absorption at 761.75 nm is very sensitive to the characteristics of the sensor spectral response and requires accurate calculations with the LBL code. Consequently, the ULCO code has been implemented in the MERIS level‐2 processing to include polarization in the scattering processes and to correct for slightly gaseous absorption, the FUB code to derive the water vapour abundance, and the LBL code to determine the barometric pressure. Impacts of the differences in the look‐up table generation on the level‐2 products (aerosol model, surface reflectance and barometric pressure) are also analysed and illustrated.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: ULCO, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, Maison de la Recherche en Environnement Naturel, 32 Avenue Foch, Wimereux, F62930, France 2: PRIVATEERS N.V., Private Experts in Remote Sensing, Great Bay Marina, Philipsburg, Netherlands Antilles, c/o Quebec, G1K‐9G3, Canada 3: HYGEOS SCOP, Société de Services et d'Etudes, Environnement et Observation de la Terre, 5 rue Héloïse, Villeneuve d'Ascq, F59650, France 4: FUB, Freie Universität Berlin, Institut für Weltraumwissenschaften, Carl‐Heinrich‐Becker‐Weg 6‐10, Berlin, D12165, Germany

Publication date: 2005-10-20

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more