Skip to main content

FFT regression and cross-noise reduction for comparing images in remote sensing

Buy Article:

$63.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

In many remote sensing studies it is desired to quantify the functional relationship between images of a given target that were acquired by different sensors. Such comparisons are problematic because when the pixel values of one image are plotted versus the other, the 'cross-noise' is quite high. Typically, the correlation coefficient is quite low, even when the compared images look alike. Nevertheless, we can try to quantify the functional relationship between two images by a suitable regression model function Y = f (X), while choosing one of them as 'the reference' Y and using the other one as a 'predictor' X. The underlying assumption of classical regression is that Y is absolutely correct while X is erroneous. Thus, the objective is to fit X to Y by choosing the parameters of Y = f (X), which minimize the 'residuals' (Ŷ - Y). When comparing images in remote sensing this objective is not valid because Y itself is error prone. The alternative FFT regression method presented herein comprises a two-stage sensor fusion approach, whereby the initially low correlation between X and Y is increased and the residuals are dramatically decreased. First, pairwise image transforms are applied to X and Y whereby the correlation coefficient is increased, e.g. from roughly 0.4 to about 0.8-0.85. A predicted image Y fft is then derived by least squares minimization between the amplitude matrices of X and Y, via the 2D FFT. In the second stage, there are two options: For one time predictions, the phase matrix of Y is combined with the amplitude matrix of Yfft, whereby an improved predicted image Y plock is formed. Usually, the residuals of Y plock versus Y are about half of the values of Yfft versus Y. For long term predictions, the phase matrix of a 'field mask' is combined with the amplitude matrices of the reference image Y and the predicted image Yfft. The field mask is a binary image of a pre-selected region of interest in X and Y. The resultant images Y pref and Y pred are modified versions of Y and Yfft respectively. The residuals of Y pred versus Y pref are even lower than the residuals of Y plock versus Y. Images Y pref and Y pred represent a close consensus of two independent imaging methods which view the same target. The practical utility of FFT regression is demonstrated by examples wherein remotely sensed NDVI images X are used for predicting yield distributions in agricultural fields. Reference yield maps Y were derived by yield monitors which measure the flow rate of the crop while it is being harvested. The 2D FFT transforms, as well as other mathematical operations in this paper were performed in the 'MATLAB' environment.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 2002-05-20

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more