Supervised versus unsupervised methods for classification of coasts and river corridors from airborne remote sensing

Authors: Thomson, A. G.; Fuller, R. M.; Eastwood, J. A.

Source: International Journal of Remote Sensing, Volume 19, Number 17, 1998 , pp. 3423-3431(9)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $61.16 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Maximum likelihood classification (MLC) is compared with unsupervised classification (USC) for operational cover mapping from airborne imagery. Data from the Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) were clustered into a large number of unsupervised subclasses then amalgamated into target classes. For extensive operational classification of coastal imagery, USC proved an acceptable alternative to MLC due to the wide spectral variation between surface classes. However, for river corridors containing a variety of vegetated surfaces with similar reflectances, USC did not produce consistent results.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014311698214091

Publication date: November 20, 1998

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page