Do subjective symptoms predict our perception of jet-lag?

Authors: Waterhouse J.1; Edwards B.1; Nevill A.1; Atkinson G.1; Reilly T.1; Davies P.2; Godfrey R.3

Source: Ergonomics, Volume 43, Number 10, 1 October 2000 , pp. 1514-1527(14)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

A total of 39 subjects were studied after a flight from the UK to either Sydney or Brisbane (10 time-zones to the east). Subjects varied widely in their age, their athletic ability, whether or not they were taking melatonin, and in their objectives when in Australia. For the first 6 days after arrival, subjects scored their jet-lag five times per day and other subjective variables up to five times per day, using visual analogue scales. For jet-lag, the scale was labelled 0= no jet-lag to 10= very bad jet-lag; the extremes of the other scales were labelled-5 and + 5, indicating marked changes compared with normal, and the centrepoint was labelled 0 indicating 'normal'. Mean daily values for jet-lag and fatigue were initially high (+ 3.65 ± 0.35 and + 1.55 ± 0.22 on day 1, respectively) and fell progressively on subsequent days, but were still raised significantly (p < 0.05) on day 5 (fatigue) or day 6 (jet-lag). In addition, times of waking were earlier on all days. By contrast, falls in concentration and motivation, and rises in irritability and nocturnal wakings, had recovered by day 4 or earlier, and bowel activity was less frequent, with harder stools, on days 1 and 2 only. Also, on day 1, there was a decrease in the ease of getting to sleep (-1.33 ± 0.55), but this changed to an increase from day 2 onwards (for example, + 0.75 ± 0.25 on day 6). Stepwise regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of jet-lag. The severity of jet-lag at all the times that were measured was strongly predicted by fatigue ratings made at the same time. Its severity at 08:00 h was predicted by an earlier time of waking, by feeling less alert 30 min after waking and, marginally, by the number of waking episodes. Jet-lag at 12:00 and 16:00 h was strongly predicted by a fall of concentration at these times; jet-lag at mealtimes (12:00, 16:00 and 20:00 h) was predicted by the amount of feeling bloated. Such results complicate an exact interpretation that can be placed on an assessment of a global term such as jet-lag, particularly if the assessment is made only once per day.

Keywords: CIRCADIAN; RHYTHMS; FATIGUE; MOOD; SLEEP

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores Henry Cotton Campus, 15 - 21 Webster Street, Liverpool L3 3ET, UK 2: >British Olympic Medical Centre, Northwick Park Hospital, Northwick Park, Middlesex, UK 3: British Olympic Medical Centre, Northwick Park Hospital, Northwick Park, Middlesex, UK

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.49 plus tax

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A