Skip to main content

Bias and commitment in science: Phenetics and cladistics

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The journal Systematic Zoology is studied in order to see what effect factionalism in the taxonomic community had on the refereeing process. Publication patterns in the journal were largely independent of changes in editorship. Although the taxonomic community was subdivided into feuding factions during the period under study, little bias along these lines was discernible in the refereeing process when studied statistically. Several explanations are suggested for the wide-spread impression at the time that bias was pervasive.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033798500200231

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60201, U.S.A.

Publication date: 1985-05-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more