Hugo de vries no mendelian? 1
Abstract:It is argued that Hugo de Vries's conversion to Mendelism did not agree with his previous theoretical framework. De Vries regarded the number of offspring expressing a certain character as a hereditary quality, intrinsic to the state of the pangene involved. His was a shortlived conversion since after the ‘rediscovery' he failed to unify his older views with Mendelism. De Vries was never very much of a Mendelian. The usual stories of the Dutch ‘rediscovery' need, therefore, a considerable reshaping.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Interfaculty of Human Movement Science and Education, Free University, Post Box 7161, 1007 MC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date: 1985-05-01