Impact of Australia's Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care program on psychologists

Authors: Pirkis, Jane1; Stokes, David2; Morley, Belinda1; Kohn, Fay1; Mathews, Rebecca2; Naccarella, Lucio1; Blashki, Grant3; Shandley, Kerrie1; Littlefield, Lyn2; Burgess, Philip4

Source: Australian Psychologist, Volume 41, Number 3, November 2006 , pp. 152-159(8)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$42.75 plus tax      Refund Policy

OR

 
More like this?
Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial

Abstract:

The aim of this paper was to consider the impact on psychologists of one component of the Australian Government's Better Outcomes in Mental Health Care (BOiMHC) program, namely the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) component. This supports psychologists and general practitioners (GPs) to work together to provide optimal mental health care, via 102 projects being conducted by Divisions of General Practice. The paper was informed by data from five sources: a project-based minimum dataset; local project evaluation reports; a forum; a survey of projects; and a survey of Australian Psychological Society (APS) members. Taken together, the data from these sources showed that a significant number of psychologists are providing services through the projects, and the majority are finding it a positive and professionally rewarding experience. There is considerable variability regarding models of retaining, locating and referring to psychologists, and there are pros and cons associated with each. The major problem identified by psychologists is the level of remuneration. BOiMHC is currently moving into a new phase of continuation and expansion, and consideration was given to whether the data point to any changes that could be made to the ATAPS projects during this period of transition. In the main, the data suggest that the status quo should be retained, but the issue of remuneration must be addressed.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1080/00050060600752656

Affiliations: 1: Program Evaluation Unit, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne 2: Australian Psychological Society 3: Department of General Practice, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 4: Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Back to top

Content Key:
Free Content - Free
New Content - New
Open Access Content - Open Access
Subscribed Content - Subscribed
Free Trial Content - Free Trial
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in
Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A