In this case study, forest fuel procurement chains of stumps and logging residues were evaluated using a Life Cycle Assessment perspective. Direct emissions from combustion were not included, but soil organic carbon change was included as changes in carbon stocks in litter and soil.
The results showed that primary forest biomass for energy has a climate impact which is time dependent. However, in long-time perspectives, there are large greenhouse gas (GHG) savings. In a short-term (20 years), there were no GHG savings when natural gas or coal was replaced. This is due
to the fact that the harvest lead to decreased input of organic matter to the soil which is compared to a reference where biomass are left to decompose. The reduction in soil organic carbon may have been underestimated in the stump harvest systems studied, as the effect of soil disturbance
per se was not included. Important factors when assessing GHG balance of forest fuels, besides the time horizon used, were site productivity, geographical position and forest fuel resource (stumps or logging residues). When assessing the greenhouse gas savings, efficiency of the end-use, allocation
method between heat and power and type of fossil fuel replaced were also important.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
greenhouse gas saving;
soil organic carbon;
Document Type: Research Article
Department of Energy and Technology,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
Department of Soil and Environment,Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
The Forestry Research Institute of Sweden,Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden
Publication date: 2011-12-01
More about this publication?