Skip to main content

Restoring natural characteristics in managed Norway spruce [ Picea abies (L.) Karst.] stands with partial cutting, dead wood creation and fire: immediate treatment effects

Buy Article:

$63.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This study investigated the immediate effects of restorative treatments on stand structure in mature managed Picea abies- dominated stands in southern Finland. The restorative treatments consisted of partial cuttings with three levels of coarse woody debris (CWD; 5, 30 and 60 m 3 ha -1 ) with a constant volume of standing retention trees (50 m 3 ha -1 ), and a burn/non-burn treatment. In addition, burned and unburned reference stands without cutting treatment were assessed. Each stand ( n =24) included an upland and a paludified biotope; the paludified biotopes burned only partially. Detailed descriptions of stand structure were made for living and dead tree components before and after restorative treatments. Changes in tree diameter distribution and increases in standing dead tree volume were greatest in the combined burning and cutting treatments. The resulting standing dead wood volume varied greatly (1–52 m 3 ha -1 ) between treatments, and was highest on burned paludified biotopes with 60 m 3 ha -1 of CWD. The results indicate that creation of down wood was needed to achieve burning and that it is possible to regulate the severity of burnings through the amount of CWD, according to ecological restoration objectives. The study demonstrates that living and dead tree structural characteristics typical of natural postdisturbance early-successional forests can be rapidly restored to mature managed spruce stands, even when a significant portion of wood volume is harvested. These types of restorative cuttings provide one potential means of conserving biodiversity in managed forests.

Keywords: Biodiversity; CWD; biotope; mortality; prescribed burning; tree diameter distribution

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14004080510040977

Affiliations: 1: Department of Forest Ecology, University of Helsinki, Finland 2: Finnish Forest Research Institute, Vantaa Research Centre, Vantaa, Finland

Publication date: 2005-10-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more