Skip to main content

Water Uptake by Planted Picea abies in Relation to Competing Field Vegetation and Seedling Rooting Depth on Two Grass-dominated Sites in Southern Sweden

Buy Article:

$55.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) seedlings were planted on 2-, 3- and 4-yr-old clear-cuttings. At the time of planting, the ground vegetation on the clear-cuttings was dominated by the grass Deschampsia flexuosa. Effects of various site preparation treatments (mounding and herbicide) were analysed during the first 3 yrs after planting. After the third growing season, seedling dry mass was significantly higher in the herbicide and mound treatments than in the control, but there was no significant difference between the herbicide and mound treatments. During a drought period in August 1995, soil water potentials were lower in untreated plots and in mounds than in the herbicide treatment, but seedling water potentials showed no evidence of water stress. The hypothesis that seedling growth was supported by water taken up from beneath the rooting zone of the ground vegetation during droughts was tested in two ways. By studying the relation between the root morphology of planted seedlings and the rooting density of the ground vegetation, and by comparing the natural abundance of an isotope of oxygen (18O) in seedling xylem water with its abundance at various depths in the soil profile. More than 70% of the total root biomass of the ground vegetation was in the top 15 cm of the soil profile. Although the planted seedlings also had the major part of their root system in the top 15 cm, each seedling also had at least one sinker root extending down to greater depths, where the rooting density of the ground vegetation was low. Soil water from the topsoil had a significantly higher 18O than water from the subsoil, but its 18O was about the same as or lower than that of xylem water. Therefore, it was concluded that seedlings took up water mainly from the topsoil, irrespective of the treatment, and the above hypothesis was rejected.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: 1999-09-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more