Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement
Authors: James Balmer1; Steve Bird2; RC Richard Davison3; Mike Doherty4; Paul Smith4
Source: Journal of Sports Sciences, Volume 22, Number 7, July 2004 , pp. 661-667(7)
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd
Abstract:
In this study, we assessed the agreement between the powers recorded during a 30 s upper-body Wingate test using three different methods. Fifty-six men completed a single test on a Monark 814E mechanically braked ergometer fitted with a Schoberer Rad Messtechnik (SRM) powermeter. A commercial software package (Wingate test kit version 2.21, Cranlea, UK) was used to calculate conventional and corrected (with accelerative forces) values of power based on a resistive load (5% body mass) and flywheel velocity. The SRM calculated powers based on torque (measured at the crank arm) and crank rate. Values for peak 1 and 5 s power and mean 30 s power were measured. No significant differences (P >0.05) were found between the three methods for 30 s power values. However, the corrected values for peak 1 and 5 s power were 36 and 23% higher (P <0.05) respectively than those for the conventional method, and 27 and 16% higher (P <0.05) respectively than those for the SRM method. The conventional and SRM values for peak 1 and 5 s power were similar (P >0.05). Power values recorded using each method were influenced by sample time (P <0.05). Our results suggest that these three measures of power are similar when sampled over 30 s, but discrepancies occur when the sample time is reduced to either 1 or 5 s.Keywords: arm cranking; maximal intensity exercise
Document Type: Research article
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001655831
Affiliations: 1: Deanery of Sciences and Social Sciences Liverpool Hope University College Liverpool UK 2: Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport Science Victoria University Melbourne Australia 3: Department of Sport and Exercise Science University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK 4: Department of Sport, Exercise and Biomedical Sciences University of Luton Luton UK
Publication date: 2004-07-01
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Internal Medicine
- By this author: James Balmer ; Steve Bird ; RC Richard Davison ; Mike Doherty ; Paul Smith

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert