Mechanically braked Wingate powers: agreement between SRM, corrected and conventional methods of measurement

Authors: James Balmer1; Steve Bird2; RC Richard Davison3; Mike Doherty4; Paul Smith4

Source: Journal of Sports Sciences, Volume 22, Number 7, July 2004 , pp. 661-667(7)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In this study, we assessed the agreement between the powers recorded during a 30 s upper-body Wingate test using three different methods. Fifty-six men completed a single test on a Monark 814E mechanically braked ergometer fitted with a Schoberer Rad Messtechnik (SRM) powermeter. A commercial software package (Wingate test kit version 2.21, Cranlea, UK) was used to calculate conventional and corrected (with accelerative forces) values of power based on a resistive load (5% body mass) and flywheel velocity. The SRM calculated powers based on torque (measured at the crank arm) and crank rate. Values for peak 1 and 5 s power and mean 30 s power were measured. No significant differences (P >0.05) were found between the three methods for 30 s power values. However, the corrected values for peak 1 and 5 s power were 36 and 23% higher (P <0.05) respectively than those for the conventional method, and 27 and 16% higher (P <0.05) respectively than those for the SRM method. The conventional and SRM values for peak 1 and 5 s power were similar (P >0.05). Power values recorded using each method were influenced by sample time (P <0.05). Our results suggest that these three measures of power are similar when sampled over 30 s, but discrepancies occur when the sample time is reduced to either 1 or 5 s.

Keywords: arm cranking; maximal intensity exercise

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02640410310001655831

Affiliations: 1: Deanery of Sciences and Social Sciences Liverpool Hope University College Liverpool UK 2: Centre for Rehabilitation, Exercise and Sport Science Victoria University Melbourne Australia 3: Department of Sport and Exercise Science University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK 4: Department of Sport, Exercise and Biomedical Sciences University of Luton Luton UK

Publication date: 2004-07-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page