@article {Seiler:2011:0898-9621:217,
title = "Outcomes Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research",
journal = "Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance",
parent_itemid = "infobike://tandf/gacr",
publishercode ="tandf",
year = "2011",
volume = "18",
number = "4",
publication date ="2011-07-01T00:00:00",
pages = "217-246",
itemtype = "ARTICLE",
issn = "0898-9621",
eissn = "1545-5815",
url = "https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tandf/gacr/2011/00000018/00000004/art00001",
doi = "doi:10.1080/08989621.2011.584760",
keyword = "role-play, assessment, responsible conduct of research",
author = "Seiler, Stephanie N. and Brummel, Bradley J. and Anderson, Kerri L. and Kim, Kyoung Jin and Wee, Serena and Gunsalus, C. K. and Loui, Michael C.",
abstract = "We describe the summative assessment of role-play scenarios that we previously developed to teach central topics in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) to graduate students in science and engineering. Interviews with role-play participants, with participants in a case discussion
training session, and with untrained students suggested that role-playing might promote a deeper appreciation of RCR by shifting the focus away from wanting to simply know the rules. We also present the results of a think-aloud case analysis study and describe the development
of a behaviorally-anchored rating scale (BARS) to assess participants' case analysis performance.",
}