Skip to main content

Two Facets of Peer Review and the Proper Role of Study Sections

Buy Article:

$63.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The current National Institutes of Health study section system is under increasing criticism due to tight budgets and decreased levels of perceived competence. There is also an overemphasis on written critiques from the study section by unsuccessful applicants. It is argued that this arises from confusion between two different purposes of peer review. A system of universal participation in peer review by senior funded investigators is proposed to ameliorate these problems.

Keywords: peer review; study sections

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989620600848660

Affiliations: Department of Physiology and Biophysics, UMDNJ–Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA

Publication date: 2006-07-01

More about this publication?
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more