The Inclusion of Minority Groups in Clinical Trials: Problems of Under Representation and Under Reporting of Data

Authors: Rochon, Paula1; Mashari, Azad2; Cohen, Ariel2; Misra, Anjali2; Laxer, Dara2; Streiner, David3; Clark, Jocalyn4; Dergal, Julie5; Gold, Jennifer6

Source: Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Volume 11, Numbers 3-4, -4/July–December 2004 , pp. 215-223(9)

Publisher: Taylor and Francis Ltd

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $50.43 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Objective: To evaluate the representation of minority groups in randomized control trials (RCTs), and the frequency with which this information is reported. Study Design: Reviewers collected data on the racial/ethnic composition of study samples from all RCTs published in six leading medical journals in 1999. Results: Of the 280 RCTs, most (204, 71.3%) provided no information on the race/ethnicity of participants. Of the 89 U.S.-based RCTs, 50 (56.1%) reported their minority distribution. Relative to other trials, those funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) (n = 52) were more likely to report race/ethnicity data (55.8% vs. 23.7%; ? 2 = 20.9, p = 0.001) and to include nonwhite participants (13.5% vs. 12.5%; ? 2 = 22.7, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Minority groups are currently under-represented in clinical trials. Information on the race and ethnicity of clinical trial participants is currently underreported in six leading medical journals. Reporting of minority group information was significantly better only in NIH funded trials, which also were more likely to include nonwhite participants. This suggests that mandatory reporting policies may have a positive effect on both reporting and representation.

Keywords: Key words; minority groups; clinical trials; medical journals; systematic review; ethnicity

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08989620490891412

Affiliations: 1: Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Departments of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences 2: Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario 3: Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto 4: Department of Public Health Sciences and The Centre for Research in Women's Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5: Kunin-Lunenfeld Applied Research Unit, Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 6: Faculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Publication date: 2004-07-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page