The Red Book and the Practice of Environmental Public Health: Promise, Pitfalls, and Progress
This paper examines the impact of the National Research Council's report Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, known as the "Red Book," on the practice of risk assessment, risk management, and the education of public health and risk professionals. The four-step approach to risk assessment was broadly adopted by the regulatory community and has a profound impact on science, research, public health, and regulatory decision-making. Early limitations and unintended negative consequences of the approach are also examined, including the isolation of public health agencies from regulatory decision-making and the de-emphasis of epidemiology and public health surveillance. Recent progress to address the gap between public health and risk assessment is described and a list of future challenges is presented to assure continued building upon the foundation provided by the first 20 years of the Red book. Among the greatest of these challenges is the continued effort to improve the interface between science and policy in risk decision-making. risk assessmentrisk managementRed BookNational Research Councilpublic healthhealth surveillance.
Keywords: National Research Council; Red Book; health surveillance; public health; risk assessment; risk management
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Publication date: 01 September 2003
- Access Key
- Free content
- Partial Free content
- New content
- Open access content
- Partial Open access content
- Subscribed content
- Partial Subscribed content
- Free trial content