Comparison of various balance systems for energy conservation in a vertically articulated manipulator with three joints

$59.35 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:


It is important to conserve dissipated energy from machines in order to reduce global warming. This paper discusses energy conservation in a vertically articulated three-joint manipulator with a rotation–pivot–pivot structure. The amount of dissipated energy can be decreased by canceling out the gravity on the second and the third links of the manipulator using a mass balancer or a spring balancer. Mass balancers are designed optimally by diminishing the inertia matrix so that the amount of dissipated energy can be minimized. Three kinds of counterbalancer systems, which include a mass–mass balancer, a spring–mass balancer and a spring–spring balancer, are designed optimally. Energy is compared among the three types of counterbalancers mounted on a three-link manipulator in simulation. The simulation indicates that a spring–mass balancer is more practical because of the considerable energy conservation effect and simplicity in implementation. In order to confirm the simulation results, the dissipated energy is measured experimentally using a practical system of a directly-driven manipulator on which a suboptimal mass–mass balancer or a spring–mass balancer is mounted. As a result, the measured dissipated energy is approximately the same as the result obtained by simulation.


Document Type: Research Article


Affiliations: Department of Electronic and Control Systems Engineering, Shimane University, Nishi-Kawatsu, Matsue, Shimane 690-8504, Japan

Publication date: September 1, 2007

Related content

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more