Variability of Doppler Velocity Ratios as a Function of Location in the Common Carotid Artery: Potential Problems When Quantifying Significant Internal Carotid Artery Stenoses

Authors: Scissons R.P.; Gillis J.C.; Patterson R.B.; Weyman A.K.

Source: Journal for Vascular Ultrasound, Volume 27, Number 1, 1 March 2003 , pp. 16-19(4)

Publisher: Society for Vascular Ultrasound

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Introduction.—The use of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to common carotid artery (CCA) peak systolic velocity ratio (ICApsv/CCApsv) to quantitate ICA stenosis has been challenged based on the variability of Doppler-derived velocities at various locations within the CCA. We investigated these alleged differences to determine whether they affect actual classification of significant ICA stenoses.

Methods.—Data from consecutive patients for an 18-month period were prospectively entered into a database. Only initial studies were included in this investigation. Follow-up examinations, postendarterectomy vessels, ICA occlusions, and CCA vessels with a PSV of >150 cm/sec were excluded from analysis. CCApsv and ICApsv/CCApsv were obtained and based on Doppler analysis at both the proximal most visualized CCA segment (proximal), and 1.5 cm proximal to the ICA flow divider (distal). ICApsv/CCApsv values of ge 2, ge 3, and ge 4 were used as threshold values for ge 50%, ge 60%, and ge 70% diameter stenoses.

Results.—A total of 383 patients and 588 vessels were analyzed. CCApsv-proximal values, 75 ± 20 cm/sec, were significantly higher than CCApsv-distal, 68 ± 16 cm/sec (p < 0.001). ICApsv/ CCApsv-distal ratios, 2.36 ± 2.77, were significantly higher than ICApsv/CCApsv-proximal, 2.11 ± 2.46, (p < 0.001). The average absolute difference between CCApsv-proximal and CCApsv-distal was 15% ± 13% (range, 0%–93%). For an ICApsv/CCApsv ge 50%, proximal and distal ratios would both be < 2 in 66%, ge 2 in 29%, and 5% were contradictory. For an ICApsv/CCApsv ge 60%, proximal and distal ratios would both be < 3 in 78%, ge 3 in 18%, and 4% contradictory. For an ICApsv/CCApsv ge 70%, proximal and distal ratios would both be < 4 in 85%, ge 4 in 12%, and in 3% contradictory.

Conclusions.—Significant differences in ICApsv/CCApsv calculation as a function of location of the CCApsv measurement were confirmed. Proximal and distal sampling sites, however, did not affect ICApsv/CCApsv classifications for 95% of the vessels analyzed. For contradictory classifications, ICApsv/CCApsv-distal had more potential for a positive result. To improve accuracy and address sensitivity or specificity interpretation parameters, the influence of the CCA sampling site should be considered and standardized when using carotid ratio criteria.

Document Type: Research article

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$28.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A